Construction claims, forensic delay, programme and dispute experience across major infrastructure, buildings, process facilities and formal proceedings.
The examples below reflect relevant experience gained across more than 50 project engagements. The 49 named projects provide a representative, non-exhaustive view of the sectors and project environments covered.
Select a sector to expand its complete named project list. Details remain intentionally concise to protect client, project and matter confidentiality.
Showing 11 of 11 sectors and 49 named projects
Three anonymised examples showing the type of analysis, structure and decision support that can be relevant on live claims and disputes.
The project record contained competing explanations for delay, changing programme logic and fragmented contemporaneous evidence.
The relevant experience involved reconstructing the event chronology, reviewing programme updates, testing critical-path effects and identifying material assumptions and evidential gaps.
The analysis gave decision-makers a clearer basis for negotiation, further investigation and proportionate next steps.
Multiple change and delay events had been notified, but the programme, contractual and cost positions were not aligned.
The relevant experience involved mapping events to notices and programme updates, reviewing claimed periods and distinguishing time entitlement from prolongation and disruption issues.
The review clarified the stronger and weaker parts of the position and the evidence requiring attention before formal submission or dispute.
Commercial positions had hardened and the matter was moving towards formal dispute resolution with legal and specialist input expected.
The relevant experience involved an independent programme and claim review, issue mapping, evidence-gap analysis and focused questions for legal and expert teams.
The review helped organise the disputed issues and informed a more targeted strategy for negotiation, expert work and formal proceedings.
These examples are deliberately anonymised and representative. They do not identify a client, appointment, project or confidential outcome.
Further detail can be provided where appropriate and subject to confidentiality obligations.