About Constructive Advisory

Independent advice.
Focused specialist support.

A focused Singapore construction claims, forensic delay, programme and dispute advisory practice supporting matters across Asia-Pacific.

Constructive Advisory Pte. Ltd. is an independent Singapore consultancy and is not affiliated with similarly named businesses operating elsewhere.

Why Constructive

A focused and collaborative alternative.

Constructive Advisory brings programme, contractual and factual issues together into a clear, defensible and commercially useful position.

The practice provides specialist work through a focused structure, clear accountability and proportionate delivery. Assignments can be delivered to contractors, developers and consultants, alongside legal teams, or as specialist support to another consultancy.

01

Focused accountability

A clear point of responsibility is maintained from instruction through analysis, reporting and resolution strategy.

02

Evidence-led advice

Programme, contractual and factual records are tested before conclusions are formed.

03

Flexible delivery

Support can be provided directly, alongside legal teams or through selected collaborators.

Sam Nason, Director of Constructive Advisory
Director profile

Sam Nason

Director, Constructive Advisory

A construction claims, delay and dispute specialist with more than 20 years of experience across Australia, Asia, the Middle East and Europe.

Sam advises contractors, subcontractors, developers, consultants and legal teams on delay and disruption analysis, contractual claims, dispute strategy, arbitration support and independent reporting.

His experience spans more than 50 building, infrastructure, industrial and water projects, from project delivery and programme controls through to claims preparation, dispute resolution and formal proceedings.

20+ yearsConstruction, project controls and dispute advisory experience
10+ arbitrationsLead delay consultant and specialist support roles
50+ projectsBuilding, infrastructure, industrial and water-sector engagements
Working with the practice

Four clear stages from first review to final deliverable.

Each engagement moves through a defined sequence while remaining proportionate to the issue. Additional work is undertaken only where the scope, timing and commercial basis are agreed.

01Initial review

Clarify the issue and immediate decision.

  • Identify the project, parties and current position
  • Understand deadlines and the immediate objective
  • Review the available records at a high level
  • Confirm whether the matter is suitable to progress
02Scope agreement

Define proportionate work and clear boundaries.

  • Agree deliverables and intended audience
  • Set the programme, dependencies and fee basis
  • Record assumptions, exclusions and interfaces
  • Complete conflict and engagement checks
03Analysis

Test the evidence before forming conclusions.

  • Review contractual, programme and factual records
  • Build chronologies, issue matrices or analyses
  • Identify gaps, limitations and competing explanations
  • Keep findings tied to the decision required
04Delivery

Provide practical findings and next steps.

  • Issue concise advice, reports or supporting exhibits
  • Explain assumptions and limitations clearly
  • Support review, negotiation or formal proceedings
  • Update the scope only where additional work is agreed
Principles

Independent. Clear. Proportionate.

Facts, assumptions and opinions are separated, evidence is tested rather than forced into a preferred narrative, and technical issues are communicated in language decision-makers can use.