Practical thinking for complex project issues.
Clear, independent commentary on forensic delay, construction claims, commercial risk, collaborative contracting and dispute strategy.
Do Contractors Secretly Love Disputes?
Why thin margins, recovery expectations, internal budgets and professional incentives can make escalation commercially rational, even when nobody genuinely wants a dispute.
Evidence, method and commercial judgement.
Strong opinions should still withstand scrutiny. These articles distinguish legitimate claims from disputes, avoid overstating what an analytical method can prove, and connect contractual rights, project relationships and commercial outcomes.
Showing 5 of 5 articles
What Records Make a Delay Claim Defensible?
The programme, site, notice, instruction, resource and cost records that help connect an event to critical delay, entitlement and commercial consequence.
Read insight03Negotiation Tactics Before Disputes Escalate
Practical steps for addressing emerging issues early while preserving contractual rights, improving project dialogue and preventing positions from hardening into formal disputes.
Read insight04When Every Minute Counts: Rethinking Profit Margins and Delay Risk
How critical delay, cost exposure, cash flow, project controls and contemporaneous records combine to affect commercial outcomes.
Read insight05Collaboration Over Control: Why Power Alone Does Not Deliver Projects
Why timely decisions, reliable information and shared problem-solving matter more than contractual dominance.
Read insight06Dispute Avoidance versus Dispute Resolution: Prevention Must Come First
Why strong projects invest in prevention while retaining a proportionate and credible route for issues that cannot be agreed.
Read insightTurn project issues into clear next steps.
An initial discussion can identify the immediate issue, available evidence and proportionate analytical approach required for your matter.